Science – and who’s destroying the reputation of it..

Hint, it’s not the Republicans hindering science (albeit that seems to always be implied..). It’s the mono-cultural self-asserting bubble of academia.. which drives people to have confirmation bias and shoddy research. But there are good news, since it seems as if the next president tries to restore at least some sanity when it comes to the original tasks of government agencies job-description. Maybe the EPA stops focusing on a greenhouse gas plants need for growth and redoubles efforts when it comes to lead-contamination in the US (I know, one can dream).

NASA is returned to the original goal of space exploration.. and while the article clearly bemoans that.. it seems – to me –  that even before the new president takes office the good news are rolling in.. the 36% of man-made climate change believers in the science community might be sad (and who knows how many have succumbed peer pressure since 2013) to , but hopefully the others feel some more space and freedom to express their believes.. as peer pressure is reduced..and maybe even the NASA page corrects their statement about how many scientists really believe in man-made climate change. After all there are scientists that don’t want to be thrown into the political fray .. even if their association promotes a political agenda..

There’s a wonderful article out there – go and use the link – it’s worth your time – that actually very accurately describes, why the real destruction of scientific trust is wrecked by the “tolerant” left..

That’s the ultimate casualty in the Left’s war: scientists’ reputations. Bad research can be exposed and discarded, but bad reputations endure.

The above conclusion of the article is what I have felt in the community and in my personal life already more than once.. and while I aimed to push back it is hard to explain to people why so many statements of the press are wrong, and even worse, why so many of the “scientific” publications about climate or global-something out there are biased, questionable and with agenda.

I close with two of my favorite cartoonists pictures about global warming..

global-warming

Even the EPA concedes that all changes they want (at 100’s of Billions of Tax-Dollar) would only result in 0.2 degree C change.. (i.e. within the inaccuracy of measurement…. !!)

global-warming-pope-nrd-600

“Merry Christmas”

 

 

 

 

Study shows whites most likely to be shot by police..

Harvard Study summary

Right on the money , the police seems to actually be more restraint when confronting black people with deadly force – from a Harvard study -from the abstract:

On the most extreme use of force – officer involved shootings – we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual
factors are taken into account.

.. now waiting for the MSM to pick this up and run with it..

The New York Times published about it. ..Legal Insurrection has picked the story up..

Kind of confirms the impression I have that every media-picked case of “unjust shot black youth” is on it’s facts actually a legal shot..