So, due to hackers, who are not proven to be Russian, we have been informed of more crime by the Democratic presidential candidate and further more mischief of the Democratic party..
And the CIA blames Russia without proof, the FBI is more reserved and doubts it. Some more unknown secret agencies all agree – gee, would I like to know who and what these agencies all do.. but that is not mentioned..
All this is really bad, since foreign money influenced elections.. big donors from the Democratic Party taken out and even worse the State Department sending money to get people to oust a foreign leader..
But are we really believing that more information about the misbehaviour of a party did do the winning for Trump???? Or is it more the very-very bad history (just one example here..) of the most secretive administration and Mrs. Clinton herself..
Voters got more information since the hacks.. and that is good.
And here another good thought..
Once again, political correctness has run amok .. while some jobs need a language other than English (i.e. a translator..), some jobs need English the standard to communicate with.. not only because the workers need to understand the directions of the leaders, but even more so in customer communication, where understanding the “king” is of uttermost importance.
So, how about that..
Two years ago, the administration laid the foundation for the new measures by suing a private American business for discriminating against Hispanic and Asian employees because they didn’t speak English on the job. The case involved a Green Bay Wisconsin metal and plastic manufacturer that fired a group of Hmong and Hispanic workers over their English skills. Forcing employees to speak English in the U.S. violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC (U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission) claimed in its lawsuit.
That’s because the Civil Rights Act protects employees from discrimination based on national origin, which includes the linguistic characteristics of a national origin group. Therefore, the EEOC argued, foreigners have the right to speak their native language even during work hours at an American company that requires English.
So does it matter if the group shuts out their non-language peers at work? Would it matter if the communication of some workers can only be achieved by the help of a translator?
There is more in the Judical Watch article, but I should close with this gem (last paragraph at the link).
In another victory, a national retailer was forced to pay $2.5 million to black job candidates that had been screened with criminal background checks. The EEOC asserts background checks have a disparate impact on African Americans and the administration has bullied companies into eliminating them.
And one would wonder if you can trust your co-workers from now on..
Hint, it’s not the Republicans hindering science (albeit that seems to always be implied..). It’s the mono-cultural self-asserting bubble of academia.. which drives people to have confirmation bias and shoddy research. But there are good news, since it seems as if the next president tries to restore at least some sanity when it comes to the original tasks of government agencies job-description. Maybe the EPA stops focusing on a greenhouse gas plants need for growth and redoubles efforts when it comes to lead-contamination in the US (I know, one can dream).
NASA is returned to the original goal of space exploration.. and while the article clearly bemoans that.. it seems – to me – that even before the new president takes office the good news are rolling in.. the 36% of man-made climate change believers in the science community might be sad (and who knows how many have succumbed peer pressure since 2013) to , but hopefully the others feel some more space and freedom to express their believes.. as peer pressure is reduced..and maybe even the NASA page corrects their statement about how many scientists really believe in man-made climate change. After all there are scientists that don’t want to be thrown into the political fray .. even if their association promotes a political agenda..
There’s a wonderful article out there – go and use the link – it’s worth your time – that actually very accurately describes, why the real destruction of scientific trust is wrecked by the “tolerant” left..
That’s the ultimate casualty in the Left’s war: scientists’ reputations. Bad research can be exposed and discarded, but bad reputations endure.
The above conclusion of the article is what I have felt in the community and in my personal life already more than once.. and while I aimed to push back it is hard to explain to people why so many statements of the press are wrong, and even worse, why so many of the “scientific” publications about climate or global-something out there are biased, questionable and with agenda.
I close with two of my favorite cartoonists pictures about global warming..
Even the EPA concedes that all changes they want (at 100’s of Billions of Tax-Dollar) would only result in 0.2 degree C change.. (i.e. within the inaccuracy of measurement…. !!)
So, generally speaking, I would reject anything Debbie Wasserman Schultz is involved in.. therefore this is in my mind stupid..
They really should use this .. if they want to promote unity and get people together in AMERICA..
But even worse.. currently the violence and property damage is done by the very same people, who would vote for the DNC-staff in a heart beat.. so where are the Harry Reids and Debbie WSs to denounce the violence and to accept the results.
A 58 percent majority of Clinton supporters say they accept Trump’s election, while 33 percent do not. Questions about Trump’s victory are passionate – 27 percent of Clinton supporters feel “strongly” he did not win legitimately.
And to add insult to (self-inflicted) injury, most of these protesters have not voted..
Over 70 percent of the 112 anti-Trump protesters recently arrested during demonstrations in Portland to contest the election results did not cast their ballots for anyone, NBC affiliate KGW Portland reported Tuesday.
Obviously these people don’t understand the boxes
(neither do they accept the results..) nor do they understand the concept of pins..
Clearly the header and the crime rate pictures are not from 2016 (too early for the electoral college county map 2016), but can somebody lead me to the creator of this or give me more background? doing my own research..
…here’s a 2014 crime by county map of the US, based on FBI data.
…and here’s the electoral college from 2016
Make your own conclusions.
What kind of mother is so involved in her world perception and the Democratic plantation mentality that she punishes her kid for a mock vote .. rather than understanding her kid’s motivation.. pure disgust..
Well, while the video has been taken down, there is still the link..
I know some readers feel not so good about HC losing but as I said, much better solution than the known crook, who would have a free reign.. everybody will watch HIM!
A message emblazoned on the homepage of the ACLU’s website read “See you in court” next to Trump’s photo, with a “Donate” button underneath.
The ACLU warned Trump that it will be “eternally vigilant every day of your presidency” and will “never waver” from protecting Americans’ Constitutional rights.
I wish the ACLU would feel as adamant about the 2nd Amendment, too..
Also dear reader, not one media outlet takes note of conservative violence (that is because conservatives accept the result of a process) which anyway did not happen when Obama won in 2008 and 2012. Despite many conservatives knowing what “horror they would face”. Nobody was out on the street, there were no protests or similar defacing/destruction of property by the “right”, but now.. the left.. talking about violence and “accepting the democratic process.”
just 5 minutes of copying links.. and it could go on for ever.. There is a reason it was laughable when media said that they fear a “violent backlash” from the conservative side if DT loses..
So, a female hack and establishment person has lost the race..
are you racist for weeping that it was a woman?? Sure not,..
And the record she has.. ??
not to talk about the fact that she’s walking over women in any way possible opposed to Trump, who at least pays women staffers better than HC or current president…
Let’s hope the media and politicians learn from this..
given that this election cycle is more of a spin cycle on both candidates, it comes as no surprise that rational arguments don’t help. In most cases the disgusting representation of Trump wins of the more serious policy failures of Clinton. Add that facts don’t count.. simple example is that a woman protecting her husband from female accusers and a out-of-court settlement of 850k $ is less weighted than suddenly found accusers of harassment, who by the way should be asked why they never tried to shake down the Trump-machine (and who will disappear from the spin-cycle once election is over). What counts more – the rational weighting of facts OR the impression build by a quite single-minded media-front ?
Anyhow, similarly the media seem to think that one side will be rebellious when losing, but if we just look at the facts on the ground, it’s not the side the media say it will be.. and Scott Adams does express this very nicely.
If you have a Trump sign in your lawn, they will steal it.
If you have a Trump bumper sticker, they will deface your car.
if you speak of Trump at work you could get fired.
On social media, almost every message I get from a Clinton supporter is a bullying type of message. They insult. They try to shame. They label. And obviously they threaten my livelihood.
We know from Project Veritas that Clinton supporters tried to incite violence at Trump rallies. The media downplays it.
We also know Clinton’s side hired paid trolls to bully online.
Go and read the rest. It’s worth it and this blog will still be there.
There is a reason I have changed the default search engine to Bing.. here’s just another reason ..
Until otherwise proven, I don’t trust Google as far as my pinky reaches on the keyboard. /hattip to Kassy Dillon