A summary of why the president should be placed in prison..

• He threw cold water on an uprising against the regime (1) in 2009, in stark contrast to his avid support for the revolution in a neighboring state (2) that replaced  an U.S. ally (3) with our vehement enemy the Muslim Brotherhood.

• He illegally sent the extremist muslims pallets of cash as a reward for kidnapping Americans.

• His nuclear deal with (1)  was a farce that freed up $150 billion for (1) to spend on its terror war against the West. It didn’t do squiddly-didts to capabilities of (1) to pursue ballistic rocket technology further nor did it in the least delay or stop the nuclear capabilities – if – it did accelerate them..

• He allowed the terror group Hezbollah to smuggle cocaine into the USA at the request of (1)    The total of US- citizens directly harmed just by this action by his policies goes by now surely in the thousands..

• While brazenly lying to the public about it, he tried to get U.S. banks to launder money for (1) in violation of sanctions.

• His administration secretly assured European countries that there would be no consequences if they violated sanctions too.

Robert Spencer is correct when he writes, “In a sane political environment, the 44th president would be tried for treason.” After all, Iran has been at war with the USA since 1979; this war has claimed numerous American casualties through the years.  The admission that Iran facilitated 9/11 provides context for Barack Obama’s pandering to America’s most vociferous enemy, which he took to perfidious extremes.   Now Iranian officials admit that Iran facilitated 9/11 by assisting al Qaeda.  The 9/11 Commission had already concluded that Iran helped bring about the deadliest terror attack in U.S. history.

(1) Iran  (2) Egypt  (3) Hosni Mubarak

Hat-tip to Moonbattery.com

Advertisements

Voters got informed .. – .. or Russia influenced elections..

So, due to hackers, who are not proven to be Russian, we have been informed of more crime by the Democratic presidential candidate and further more mischief of the Democratic party..

And the CIA blames Russia without proof, the FBI is more reserved and doubts it. Some more unknown secret agencies all agree – gee, would I like to know who and what these agencies all do.. but that is not mentioned..

All this is really bad, since foreign money influenced elections.. big donors from the Democratic Party taken out and even worse the State Department sending money to get people to oust a foreign leader..

But are we really believing that more information about the misbehaviour of a party did do the winning for Trump???? Or is it more the very-very bad history (just one example here..) of the most secretive administration and Mrs. Clinton herself..

Voters got more information since the hacks.. and that is good.

And here another good thought..

 

 

 

 

 

 

A trend imported?

Seems that the Ohio University car-knife attack is a copy cat from the “knife intifada” the Palestinensiens conduct on Israel..  as a side note, Ohio does not allow campus-concealed carry and the only person effectively able to fight back was the luckily on-site police officer.

The good news is then it seems that the average joe has actually not the means to get a firearm illegally…   and that firearms in the hands of good people solve such problem ..

But also it shows that terrorism can not be stopped and people will find ways to inflict injury and death..

Go and learn a skill and get legal with itInstructors are found here..

 

 

Safety pin? Why not a lapel pin..

So, generally speaking, I would reject anything Debbie Wasserman Schultz is involved in.. therefore this is in my mind stupid..

https://i1.wp.com/www.weaselzippers.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CxQKWT5UUAAYzGx.jpg

They really should use this .. if they want to promote unity and get people together in AMERICA..

or 

But even worse.. currently the violence and property damage is done by the very same people, who would vote for the DNC-staff in a heart beat.. so where are the Harry Reids and Debbie WSs to denounce the violence and to accept the results.

A 58 percent majority of Clinton supporters say they accept Trump’s election, while 33 percent do not. Questions about Trump’s victory are passionate – 27 percent of Clinton supporters feel “strongly” he did not win legitimately.

And to add insult to (self-inflicted) injury, most of these protesters have not voted..

Over 70 percent of the 112 anti-Trump protesters recently arrested during demonstrations in Portland to contest the election results did not cast their ballots for anyone, NBC affiliate KGW Portland reported Tuesday.

Obviously these people  don’t understand the boxes

Image result for four boxes

(neither do they accept the results..) nor do they understand the concept of pins..